Intervet UK Ltd v Merial R.'s University of Belfast the University of Saskatchewan
The patent is invalid for lack of entitlement to priority, obviousness over Nayar, and insufficiency; Intervet’s Porcilis PCV does not infringe claim 18 as construed; proposed amendments do not save the patent.
- Parties
- Claimant: Intervet UK Limited; Defendant: Merial; Defendant: The Queen’s University of Belfast; Defendant: The University of Saskatchewan
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Patent Infringement and Revocation / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Patent revoked; no infringement found.
- Legal Topics
- Patent Validity, Priority, Obviousness, Insufficiency, Infringement, Amendment, Diagnostic Methods, Vaccines
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Intervet UK Limited
Claimant
Merial
Defendant
The Queen’s University of Belfast
Defendant
The University of Saskatchewan
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Patent Infringement and Revocation / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether European Patent (UK) No. 1 386 617 is valid
- 2 Whether the patent is entitled to priority from the Priority Document
- 3 Whether the patent is obvious in light of Nayar
Ratio Decidendi
The patent is invalid for lack of entitlement to priority, obviousness over Nayar, and insufficiency; Intervet’s Porcilis PCV does not infringe claim 18 as construed; proposed amendments do not save the patent.
Court Disposition
Patent revoked; no infringement found.
Orders
- Patent revoked.
- Intervet has not infringed claim 18.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment