R v Metab Islam
The case involved a highly unusual factual issue due to the number and span of allegations and the extensive, phased disclosure, justifying a finding that the work done was substantially in excess of the norm and merited a special preparation fee under Regulation 17(1)(a).
- Parties
- Prosecution: R; Defendant: Metab Islam; Appellant/counsel: Stella Hayden
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal (costs) / Appeal Against Determining Officer's Decision on Special Preparation Claim
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Special Preparation Fees, Disclosure, Bad Character Applications, Legal Aid Remuneration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R
Prosecution
Metab Islam
Defendant
Stella Hayden
Appellant/counsel
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal (costs) / Appeal Against Determining Officer's Decision on Special Preparation Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the work done by counsel was substantially in excess of the amount normally done for cases of the same type under Regulation 17(1)(a) of the Criminal Legal Aid (Remuneration) Regulations 2013
- 2 Whether the case involved a very unusual or novel point of law or factual issue justifying special preparation fees
Ratio Decidendi
The case involved a highly unusual factual issue due to the number and span of allegations and the extensive, phased disclosure, justifying a finding that the work done was substantially in excess of the norm and merited a special preparation fee under Regulation 17(1)(a).
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Determining officer directed to make an additional payment to counsel for 30 hours of special preparation.
- Counsel awarded £410 for costs (exclusive of VAT) and the £100 paid on appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment