O, R (On the Application Of) v Metropolitan Police
The decision to continue conditional police bail was lawful because there was an ongoing investigation, objective justification for the conditions, and no irrationality or unlawfulness in the exercise of the statutory powers. The irrelevant considerations in the police email did not form the basis of the bail decision.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: O; Defendant: Metropolitan Police
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Police Bail, Conditional Bail, Article 5 ECHR, Judicial Review of Police Decisions, Proportionality, Wednesbury Unreasonableness
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
O
Claimant
Metropolitan Police
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the decision to continue conditional police bail was lawful
- 2 Whether the reasons for imposing and continuing bail conditions were within statutory powers
- 3 Whether the continuation of bail was disproportionate or engaged Article 5 ECHR
Ratio Decidendi
The decision to continue conditional police bail was lawful because there was an ongoing investigation, objective justification for the conditions, and no irrationality or unlawfulness in the exercise of the statutory powers. The irrelevant considerations in the police email did not form the basis of the bail decision.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application for judicial review dismissed
- Claimant to pay defendant's costs summarily assessed at £5,040.60 within 21 days
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment