SHARON GREEN & ORS. v METROPOLITAN POLICE COMMISSIONER & ANOR.
Regulation C9 of the Police Pensions Regulations 1987, which ceases survivor pensions on remarriage, civil partnership, or cohabitation, is objectively justified and proportionate. The rule maintains the integrity of the contributory pension scheme, adheres to the principle of prospectivity, and was addressed through the introduction of new schemes. The Home Secretary has discharged the onus of justification under Articles 8, 12, and 14 ECHR. The claim fails.
- Parties
- Claimant: Sharon Green; Claimant: Jacqueline Andrea Jennings; Claimant: Paul Robert Sneller; Defendant: Metropolitan Police Commissioner; Interested Party: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 May 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / High Court Judgment, Permission to Appeal Granted
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Police Pensions, Article 8 ECHR, Article 12 ECHR, Article 14 ECHR, Discrimination, Prospectivity in Pension Schemes, Retrospective Legislation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sharon Green
Claimant
Jacqueline Andrea Jennings
Claimant
Paul Robert Sneller
Claimant
Metropolitan Police Commissioner
Defendant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / High Court Judgment, Permission to Appeal Granted
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Regulation C9 of the Police Pensions Regulations 1987 is incompatible with Convention rights under Articles 8, 12, and 14 (read with A1P1) of the ECHR
- 2 Whether the cessation of survivor pensions on remarriage, civil partnership, or cohabitation is objectively justified and proportionate
- 3 Whether the difference in treatment between survivors of officers who died in the line of duty and others is justified
Ratio Decidendi
Regulation C9 of the Police Pensions Regulations 1987, which ceases survivor pensions on remarriage, civil partnership, or cohabitation, is objectively justified and proportionate. The rule maintains the integrity of the contributory pension scheme, adheres to the principle of prospectivity, and was addressed through the introduction of new schemes. The Home Secretary has discharged the onus of justification under Articles 8, 12, and 14 ECHR. The claim fails.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Claimants to pay 90% of the Home Secretary’s costs and the full costs of the November 2020 application
- Permission to appeal granted to the Claimants on two grounds: (1) whether Regulation C9 impairs the essence of the right to marry; (2) whether the Home Secretary has discharged the onus of justification under Articles 8 and 14
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment