MF, R. v [2024] EWCA Crim 111 (25 January 2024)

MF, R. v [2024] EWCA Crim 111 (25 January 2024)

There are no arguable grounds to show the conviction is unsafe; the applicant's criticisms of trial counsel and the judge's summing-up do not undermine the safety of the conviction. The delay in applying for leave to appeal is unjustified and no new evidence materially affects the case.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] EWCA Crim 111
Parties
Applicant: MF; Respondent: Rex
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
25 January 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Conviction
Outcome
renewed application for leave to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Sexual Offences, Appeals, Conviction Safety, Trial Procedure
Criminal Law Sexual Offences Appeals Conviction Safety Trial Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

MF

Applicant

Rex

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Conviction

  1. 1 Whether there are arguable grounds to show the conviction is unsafe
  2. 2 Whether the delay in applying for leave to appeal is justified
  3. 3 Whether trial counsel's decisions prejudiced the applicant

Ratio Decidendi

There are no arguable grounds to show the conviction is unsafe; the applicant's criticisms of trial counsel and the judge's summing-up do not undermine the safety of the conviction. The delay in applying for leave to appeal is unjustified and no new evidence materially affects the case.

Court Disposition

renewed application for leave to appeal refused