MF, R. v [2024] EWCA Crim 111 (25 January 2024)
There are no arguable grounds to show the conviction is unsafe; the applicant's criticisms of trial counsel and the judge's summing-up do not undermine the safety of the conviction. The delay in applying for leave to appeal is unjustified and no new evidence materially affects the case.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] EWCA Crim 111
- Parties
- Applicant: MF; Respondent: Rex
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 January 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Conviction
- Outcome
- renewed application for leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences, Appeals, Conviction Safety, Trial Procedure
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MF
Applicant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there are arguable grounds to show the conviction is unsafe
- 2 Whether the delay in applying for leave to appeal is justified
- 3 Whether trial counsel's decisions prejudiced the applicant
Ratio Decidendi
There are no arguable grounds to show the conviction is unsafe; the applicant's criticisms of trial counsel and the judge's summing-up do not undermine the safety of the conviction. The delay in applying for leave to appeal is unjustified and no new evidence materially affects the case.
Court Disposition
renewed application for leave to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment