MG v SN [2024] EWFC 202 (B) (23 July 2024)
The mother's allegations of coercive control, rape, sexual assault, threats, and verbal abuse are not proved on the balance of probabilities. The evidence, including contemporaneous WhatsApp messages, police records, and professional reports, does not support the existence of a pattern of coercive or controlling behaviour by the father. The mother's accounts are inconsistent, often confused, and arose during periods of acute mental illness. The father's evidence is consistent, corroborated by documentary evidence, and not contradicted by objective facts. The burden of proof has not been discharged by the mother.
- Citation
- [2024] EWFC 202 (B)
- Parties
- Applicant: MG; Respondent: SN
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 July 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Private Law Family Proceedings (child Arrangements, Prohibited Steps, Fact Finding) / Fact Finding Hearing, Judgment
- Outcome
- All allegations against the father are not proved. No findings of domestic abuse, coercive control, rape, sexual assault, or threats are made against the father.
- Legal Topics
- Coercive Control, Fact Finding, Child Arrangements, Domestic Abuse Allegations, Mental Health, Evidentiary Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MG
Applicant
SN
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Private Law Family Proceedings (child Arrangements, Prohibited Steps, Fact Finding) / Fact Finding Hearing, Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the father engaged in coercive control or domestic abuse against the mother
- 2 Whether the father committed rape or sexual assault
- 3 Whether the father threatened to release intimate videos
Ratio Decidendi
The mother's allegations of coercive control, rape, sexual assault, threats, and verbal abuse are not proved on the balance of probabilities. The evidence, including contemporaneous WhatsApp messages, police records, and professional reports, does not support the existence of a pattern of coercive or controlling behaviour by the father. The mother's accounts are inconsistent, often confused, and arose during periods of acute mental illness. The father's evidence is consistent, corroborated by documentary evidence, and not contradicted by objective facts. The burden of proof has not been discharged by the mother.
Court Disposition
All allegations against the father are not proved. No findings of domestic abuse, coercive control, rape, sexual assault, or threats are made against the father.
Orders
- No findings made against the father in respect of the mother's allegations.
- Directions to proceed to welfare stage for child arrangements.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment