Holman v Howes

Holman v Howes

The parties intended equal beneficial ownership at the time of purchase, and post-acquisition conduct did not alter that intention. However, the assurance given by the respondent to the claimant that she could remain in the property as long as she wished created a proprietary estoppel, entitling her to remain...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: Mia Holman; Respondent: Graham Howes
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
27 July 2007
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court
Outcome
Appeal dismissed on beneficial interest; allowed on proprietary estoppel; cross-appeal refused.
Legal Topics
Beneficial Interests, Trusts of Land, Proprietary Estoppel, Orders for Sale
Property Law Equity Beneficial Interests Trusts of Land Proprietary Estoppel Orders for Sale

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mia Holman

Appellant

Graham Howes

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 What are the respective beneficial interests of the parties in the property known as Wilbury?
  2. 2 Is the claimant entitled to a more secure right of occupation based on proprietary estoppel?
  3. 3 Should an order for sale of the property be made against the claimant's wishes?

Ratio Decidendi

The parties intended equal beneficial ownership at the time of purchase, and post-acquisition conduct did not alter that intention. However, the assurance given by the respondent to the claimant that she could remain in the property as long as she wished created a proprietary estoppel, entitling her to remain indefinitely, and no order for sale should be made without her consent.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed on beneficial interest; allowed on proprietary estoppel; cross-appeal refused.

Orders

  • No order for sale of Wilbury shall be made against the will or without the consent of the claimant.
  • The charge in favour of RN Limited is enforceable only over the respondent's beneficial interest.