Lalana Hans Place Ltd v Michael Barclay Partnership LLP [2017] EWHC 29 (TCC) (13 January 2017)
The claimant must answer the Part 18 request because the information sought is relevant to the factual basis of the claim and can be addressed without prejudicing trial preparation; privilege and waiver issues may be asserted and resolved separately.
- Citation
- [2017] EWHC 29 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant: Lalana Hans Place Limited; Defendant: Michael Barclay Partnership LLP
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 January 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Further Information in Civil Litigation / Pre Trial Interlocutory Hearing
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Litigation Privilege, Disclosure, Expert Evidence, Remedial Works, Waiver of Privilege
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lalana Hans Place Limited
Claimant
Michael Barclay Partnership LLP
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Further Information in Civil Litigation / Pre Trial Interlocutory Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant must answer a Part 18 request for further information regarding expert advice
- 2 Whether the request is late and prejudicial
- 3 Whether litigation privilege applies to the expert's advice
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant must answer the Part 18 request because the information sought is relevant to the factual basis of the claim and can be addressed without prejudicing trial preparation; privilege and waiver issues may be asserted and resolved separately.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Claimant to answer the Part 18 request for further information
- Privilege and waiver issues to be addressed at trial if asserted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment