Michael Barrett v The Commissioners for HMRC
Mr Barrett had a reasonable excuse for failing to notify liability to the HICBC because he was not within self-assessment, his partner's child benefit claim predated the HICBC, he did not receive specific notification from HMRC prior to September 2022, and it was objectively reasonable in his circumstances not to have notified. The penalty is therefore cancelled.
- Parties
- Appellant: Michael Barrett; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision on Penalty Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- High Income Child Benefit Charge, Penalties for Failure to Notify Liability, Reasonable Excuse
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Barrett
Appellant
The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision on Penalty Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the penalty for failure to notify liability to the High Income Child Benefit Charge was validly issued
- 2 Whether the appellant had a reasonable excuse for the failure to notify liability
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Barrett had a reasonable excuse for failing to notify liability to the HICBC because he was not within self-assessment, his partner's child benefit claim predated the HICBC, he did not receive specific notification from HMRC prior to September 2022, and it was objectively reasonable in his circumstances not to have notified. The penalty is therefore cancelled.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The penalty for failure to notify liability to the High Income Child Benefit Charge is cancelled.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment