Beer & Anor v Bexbes Llp [2009] EWCA Civ 628 (26 June 2009)
The performance sharing payments were remuneration for Mr Beer's employment under a 4-year contract and not part of the consideration for the sale of MBT. Therefore, they should be excluded from the calculation of the additional fee payable to BexBes.
- Citation
- [2009] EWCA Civ 628
- Parties
- Appellant: Michael Beer; Appellant: Jane Beer; Respondent: BexBes LLP
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 June 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Contract Interpretation, Calculation of Consideration, Agency Fees, Employment Remuneration Vs. Sale Consideration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Beer
Appellant
Jane Beer
Appellant
BexBes LLP
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether 'performance sharing' payments to Mr Beer under a 4-year contract should be included in the calculation of 'consideration' for the sale of MBT for the purpose of BexBes' fee.
Ratio Decidendi
The performance sharing payments were remuneration for Mr Beer's employment under a 4-year contract and not part of the consideration for the sale of MBT. Therefore, they should be excluded from the calculation of the additional fee payable to BexBes.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- The principal sum payable to BexBes remains £57,780.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment