McGann v Bisping

McGann v Bisping

The management agreement was not a contract for personal services because it was assignable and its obligations could be performed by someone other than the Claimant; therefore, it vested in the trustee upon bankruptcy and the Claimant had no standing to claim under it.

Parties
Claimant: Anthony McGann; Defendant: Michael Bisping
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 March 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application to Strike Out Claim
Outcome
Claim struck out
Legal Topics
Bankruptcy, Assignment of Contracts, Personal Services Contracts, Management Agreements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Anthony McGann

Claimant

Michael Bisping

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Application to Strike Out Claim

  1. 1 Whether a management agreement is property that vests in the trustee upon bankruptcy under section 283 of the Insolvency Act 1986
  2. 2 Whether the management agreement is a contract for personal services and thus excluded from the bankrupt's estate

Ratio Decidendi

The management agreement was not a contract for personal services because it was assignable and its obligations could be performed by someone other than the Claimant; therefore, it vested in the trustee upon bankruptcy and the Claimant had no standing to claim under it.

Court Disposition

Claim struck out

Orders

  • Claim struck out as any claim under the management agreement vested in the trustee in bankruptcy; parties invited to agree an order