R v Bowman & Anor

R v Bowman & Anor

The trial judge did not err in admitting the prior convictions as evidence of propensity; the convictions were relevant to important matters in issue, and the judge exercised discretion properly, giving clear directions to the jury regarding the limited use of such evidence. The convictions were sufficiently similar and probative, and their admission did not render the trial unfair.

Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: Michael Bowman; Appellant: Mark Lennon
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
15 April 2014
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Bad Character Evidence, Propensity, Firearms Offences, Admissibility of Prior Convictions, Joint Enterprise
Criminal Law Bad Character Evidence Propensity Firearms Offences Admissibility of Prior Convictions Joint Enterprise

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Michael Bowman

Appellant

Mark Lennon

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in admitting evidence of the appellants' bad character via prior convictions as evidence of propensity under section 101(1)(d) Criminal Justice Act 2003
  2. 2 Whether the admission of such evidence was unfair or prejudicial to the appellants
  3. 3 Whether the convictions established a relevant propensity to commit the offences charged

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge did not err in admitting the prior convictions as evidence of propensity; the convictions were relevant to important matters in issue, and the judge exercised discretion properly, giving clear directions to the jury regarding the limited use of such evidence. The convictions were sufficiently similar and probative, and their admission did not render the trial unfair.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Bowman's appeal against conviction dismissed
  • Lennon's appeal against conviction dismissed