Carter v Bailey & Anor (Sturgeon Central Asia Balanced Fund Ltd) [2020] EWHC 123 (Ch) (27 January 2020)
The recognition order must be terminated because the winding up of Sturgeon Central Asia Balanced Fund Ltd in Bermuda is not a 'foreign proceeding' within the meaning of Article 2(i) of the Model Law/CBIR, as it is a solvent liquidation and not for the purpose of resolving insolvency or severe financial distress....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] EWHC 123 (Ch)
- Parties
- Applicant: Michael Carter; Respondents: Roy Bailey and Keiran Hutchison (as foreign representatives of Sturgeon Central Asia Balanced Fund Ltd)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 January 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application Under Cross Border Insolvency Regulations 2006 (cbir) / High Court Review of Ex Parte Recognition Order
- Outcome
- Recognition order terminated
- Legal Topics
- Recognition of Foreign Insolvency Proceedings, Interpretation of UNCITRAL Model Law, Standing to Challenge Recognition, Solvent Liquidation
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Carter
Applicant
Roy Bailey and Keiran Hutchison (as foreign representatives of Sturgeon Central Asia Balanced Fund Ltd)
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Review Application Under Cross Border Insolvency Regulations 2006 (cbir) / High Court Review of Ex Parte Recognition Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the winding up of a solvent company is a 'foreign proceeding' under Article 2(i) of the Model Law as enacted by the CBIR and thus capable of recognition
- 2 Whether the applicant (former director) has standing as a 'person affected by recognition' to seek review/termination of the recognition order
Ratio Decidendi
The recognition order must be terminated because the winding up of Sturgeon Central Asia Balanced Fund Ltd in Bermuda is not a 'foreign proceeding' within the meaning of Article 2(i) of the Model Law/CBIR, as it is a solvent liquidation and not for the purpose of resolving insolvency or severe financial distress. The Model Law and CBIR do not extend to solvent liquidations. The applicant has standing as a person affected by recognition.
Court Disposition
Recognition order terminated
Orders
- The recognition order made on 17 May 2019 is terminated.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment