Collins & Ors, R v
The judge's direction to the jury to exercise a common law right to stop the case was a material irregularity that rendered the convictions unsafe; the cumulative effect of irregularities and errors required the convictions to be quashed and a retrial directed.
- Parties
- Prosecution: R; Appellant: Michael Collins; Appellant: Colin Threadgill; Appellant: Peter Alan Morrison; Appellant: Bronson Tyers
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 April 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- convictions quashed; retrial directed
- Legal Topics
- Jury Directions, Abuse of Process, Adverse Inference, Burden of Proof, Case Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R
Prosecution
Michael Collins
Appellant
Colin Threadgill
Appellant
Peter Alan Morrison
Appellant
Bronson Tyers
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge's direction to the jury to exercise a common law right to stop the case rendered the verdicts unsafe
- 2 Whether the judge should have ruled there was no case to answer
- 3 Whether the summing-up and directions on law were adequate
Ratio Decidendi
The judge's direction to the jury to exercise a common law right to stop the case was a material irregularity that rendered the convictions unsafe; the cumulative effect of irregularities and errors required the convictions to be quashed and a retrial directed.
Court Disposition
convictions quashed; retrial directed
Orders
- Convictions on counts 1 and 2 quashed for all appellants.
- Retrial directed on counts 1 and 2.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment