Challenger, R v [2007] EWCA Crim 2445 (3 October 2007)
The minimum term of five years was excessive in light of existing sentencing authorities and the appellant's circumstances. The appropriate minimum term is four years, reflecting the seriousness of the offence but also the guidance from previous case law.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2007] EWCA Crim 2445
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: Michael Darren Challenger
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 October 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Wounding With Intent, Imprisonment for Public Protection, Minimum Term, Dangerousness, Use of Knife, Youth Offenders
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Michael Darren Challenger
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of detention for public protection with a minimum term of five years was excessive for a 17-year-old convicted of wounding with intent under section 18 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861
- 2 Whether the finding of dangerousness and imposition of imprisonment for public protection was justified
Ratio Decidendi
The minimum term of five years was excessive in light of existing sentencing authorities and the appellant's circumstances. The appropriate minimum term is four years, reflecting the seriousness of the offence but also the guidance from previous case law.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Minimum term for detention for public protection reduced from five years to four years.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment