Michael David Salmon v R

Michael David Salmon v R

There was no abuse of process in amending the indictment to add blackmail counts after the appellant's guilty pleas, as there was no agreement or representation precluding further charges and the amendment was necessary to reflect the true gravity of the offending. The overall sentence of nine years' imprisonment was not manifestly excessive or wrong in principle given the seriousness, aggravating features, and the judge's application of totality.

Parties
Appellant: Michael David Salmon; Respondent: The King
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Appeal against conviction and sentence dismissed
Legal Topics
Sexual Offences, Blackmail, Abuse of Process, Sentencing, Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Michael David Salmon

Appellant

The King

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

  1. 1 Whether it was an abuse of process to amend the indictment to add blackmail counts after guilty pleas to sexual offences
  2. 2 Whether the overall sentence of nine years' imprisonment was manifestly excessive or wrong in principle

Ratio Decidendi

There was no abuse of process in amending the indictment to add blackmail counts after the appellant's guilty pleas, as there was no agreement or representation precluding further charges and the amendment was necessary to reflect the true gravity of the offending. The overall sentence of nine years' imprisonment was not manifestly excessive or wrong in principle given the seriousness, aggravating features, and the judge's application of totality.

Court Disposition

Appeal against conviction and sentence dismissed

Orders

  • Appeals against conviction and sentence dismissed
  • Representation order extended to cover application for leave to appeal conviction