Michael David Salmon v R
There was no abuse of process in amending the indictment to add blackmail counts after the appellant's guilty pleas, as there was no agreement or representation precluding further charges and the amendment was necessary to reflect the true gravity of the offending. The overall sentence of nine years' imprisonment was not manifestly excessive or wrong in principle given the seriousness, aggravating features, and the judge's application of totality.
- Parties
- Appellant: Michael David Salmon; Respondent: The King
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal against conviction and sentence dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences, Blackmail, Abuse of Process, Sentencing, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael David Salmon
Appellant
The King
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether it was an abuse of process to amend the indictment to add blackmail counts after guilty pleas to sexual offences
- 2 Whether the overall sentence of nine years' imprisonment was manifestly excessive or wrong in principle
Ratio Decidendi
There was no abuse of process in amending the indictment to add blackmail counts after the appellant's guilty pleas, as there was no agreement or representation precluding further charges and the amendment was necessary to reflect the true gravity of the offending. The overall sentence of nine years' imprisonment was not manifestly excessive or wrong in principle given the seriousness, aggravating features, and the judge's application of totality.
Court Disposition
Appeal against conviction and sentence dismissed
Orders
- Appeals against conviction and sentence dismissed
- Representation order extended to cover application for leave to appeal conviction
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment