Corcoran, R v
The confiscation order must be recalculated to deduct costs of sale at 3% and the benefit figure must be £624,000, as the basis of plea was intended to apply to confiscation proceedings.
- Parties
- Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Michael Edward Corcoran
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 July 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Confiscation Order, Drug Trafficking, Basis of Plea, Statutory Assumptions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Parties
Regina
Respondent
Michael Edward Corcoran
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether costs of sale should have been deducted from the value of realisable assets in the confiscation order
- 2 Whether the benefit figure for the appellant should be £624,000 or £722,000 based on the basis of plea
Ratio Decidendi
The confiscation order must be recalculated to deduct costs of sale at 3% and the benefit figure must be £624,000, as the basis of plea was intended to apply to confiscation proceedings.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Costs of sale to be deducted at 3% from property value in confiscation order.
- Appellant's benefit figure set at £624,000 for confiscation purposes.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment