Corcoran, R v

Corcoran, R v

The confiscation order must be recalculated to deduct costs of sale at 3% and the benefit figure must be £624,000, as the basis of plea was intended to apply to confiscation proceedings.

Parties
Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Michael Edward Corcoran
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
03 July 2008
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Confiscation Order, Drug Trafficking, Basis of Plea, Statutory Assumptions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

Michael Edward Corcoran

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether costs of sale should have been deducted from the value of realisable assets in the confiscation order
  2. 2 Whether the benefit figure for the appellant should be £624,000 or £722,000 based on the basis of plea

Ratio Decidendi

The confiscation order must be recalculated to deduct costs of sale at 3% and the benefit figure must be £624,000, as the basis of plea was intended to apply to confiscation proceedings.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • Costs of sale to be deducted at 3% from property value in confiscation order.
  • Appellant's benefit figure set at £624,000 for confiscation purposes.