Evans & Anor, R v
The summing up, though not structured with a discrete section for Carney's defence, fairly and adequately put all relevant evidence and arguments to the jury. The conviction was not unsafe. The sentences, though severe, were justified due to the racially aggravated nature of the offence and the vulnerability of the victim; no distinction between appellants was required.
- Parties
- Respondent: R; Appellant: Michael Evans; Appellant: James Carney
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 June 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Manslaughter, Racially Aggravated Offences, Sentencing, Summing Up, Joint Enterprise
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R
Respondent
Michael Evans
Appellant
James Carney
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge's summing up was unfair to Carney
- 2 Whether the conviction of manslaughter was unsafe
- 3 Whether the sentences imposed were manifestly excessive or should have distinguished between appellants
Ratio Decidendi
The summing up, though not structured with a discrete section for Carney's defence, fairly and adequately put all relevant evidence and arguments to the jury. The conviction was not unsafe. The sentences, though severe, were justified due to the racially aggravated nature of the offence and the vulnerability of the victim; no distinction between appellants was required.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed
Orders
- Carney's appeal against conviction dismissed
- Both appellants' appeals against sentence dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment