Collardeau v Fuchs: Contempt of Court
The Defendant was in contempt of court for breaching paragraph 9 of the order of 28 March 2025 by selling ML1, as the order was effectively served by email pursuant to a valid alternative service order, and the Defendant had knowledge of the order and its terms. Procedural defects in service, if any, are waived as no injustice was caused.
- Parties
- Claimant: Alvina Collardeau; Defendant: Michael Fuchs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 November 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Contempt of Court / Judgment on Liability, Sentencing Adjourned
- Outcome
- Defendant found guilty of contempt of court for breach of paragraph 9 of the order of 28 March 2025; sentencing adjourned.
- Legal Topics
- Contempt of Court, Service of Orders, Alternative Service, Financial Remedy, Enforcement of Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alvina Collardeau
Claimant
Michael Fuchs
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Contempt of Court / Judgment on Liability, Sentencing Adjourned
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Defendant breached the preservation order by selling ML1
- 2 Whether the Defendant breached the order by impeding domestication of court orders abroad
- 3 Whether service by email constituted effective service for contempt proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The Defendant was in contempt of court for breaching paragraph 9 of the order of 28 March 2025 by selling ML1, as the order was effectively served by email pursuant to a valid alternative service order, and the Defendant had knowledge of the order and its terms. Procedural defects in service, if any, are waived as no injustice was caused.
Court Disposition
Defendant found guilty of contempt of court for breach of paragraph 9 of the order of 28 March 2025; sentencing adjourned.
Orders
- Sentencing adjourned to January or early February 2026.
- Judgment to be published on Judiciary website.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment