Collardeau v Fuchs (Contempt of Court: Sentencing) [2026] EWFC 44 (11 February 2026)
The defendant was found in contempt of court for breaching a specific court order by selling a prohibited asset, but as he had remedied the breach by paying all sums due and the impact on the claimant was ultimately neutralized, no separate penalty was imposed beyond a substantial costs order.
- Citation
- [2026] EWFC 44
- Parties
- Claimant: Alvina Collardeau; Defendant: Michael Fuchs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 February 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Contempt of Court (family) / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Defendant found in contempt of court; no separate penalty imposed; costs order made against defendant.
- Legal Topics
- Enforcement of Financial Orders, Committal Proceedings, Sentencing for Contempt, Costs Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alvina Collardeau
Claimant
Michael Fuchs
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Contempt of Court (family) / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant was in contempt of court for breaching a court order prohibiting the sale of property
- 2 Appropriate sanction for contempt of court in the context of family financial remedy proceedings
- 3 Assessment of costs in contempt proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant was found in contempt of court for breaching a specific court order by selling a prohibited asset, but as he had remedied the breach by paying all sums due and the impact on the claimant was ultimately neutralized, no separate penalty was imposed beyond a substantial costs order.
Court Disposition
Defendant found in contempt of court; no separate penalty imposed; costs order made against defendant.
Orders
- Defendant to pay claimant's costs summarily assessed at £100,000 inclusive of VAT, payable within 21 days.
- No separate penalty for contempt of court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment