English, Welsh & Scottish Railway Ltd v Goodman [2007] EWHC 3463 (QB) (09 May 2007)

English, Welsh & Scottish Railway Ltd v Goodman [2007] EWHC 3463 (QB) (09 May 2007)

The claim was struck out because it was pleaded in a vague, unfocused, and unparticularised manner, amounting to an abuse of process. The claimant failed to provide adequate particulars or evidential foundation for its claims, making it impossible for the defendant to know the case to meet or prepare a defence.

Citation
[2007] EWHC 3463 (QB)
Parties
Claimant: English, Welsh & Scottish Railway Limited; Defendant: Michael Goodman
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
09 May 2007
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application to Strike Out Claim
Outcome
claim struck out; judgment for defendant
Legal Topics
Strike Out Application, Abuse of Process, Pleadings, Restrictive Covenants, Confidential Information, Costs

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

English, Welsh & Scottish Railway Limited

Claimant

Michael Goodman

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Application to Strike Out Claim

  1. 1 Whether the claimant's particulars of claim are sufficiently particularised to allow the defendant to know the case to meet
  2. 2 Whether the claim is an abuse of process due to lack of specificity and foundation
  3. 3 Whether any part of the claim should proceed to trial

Ratio Decidendi

The claim was struck out because it was pleaded in a vague, unfocused, and unparticularised manner, amounting to an abuse of process. The claimant failed to provide adequate particulars or evidential foundation for its claims, making it impossible for the defendant to know the case to meet or prepare a defence.

Court Disposition

claim struck out; judgment for defendant

Orders

  • Claimant to pay defendant's costs on an indemnity basis, including reserved costs relating to hearings before Judge Seymour.
  • Interim payment of £75,000 to defendant within 14 days.