R v Michael Henry McDonnell & Anor
The sentencing judge correctly applied the totality principle, made substantial downward adjustments for consecutive sentences, and did not double count aggravating factors. The total sentences imposed were not manifestly excessive and were justified given the seriousness of the offences, including the exploitation of a child and large-scale drug supply.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Rex; Appellant: Michael Henry McDonnell; Appellant: Rhys Mervyn Henry Johnson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 August 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Human Trafficking, Drug Offences, Totality Principle, County Lines, Exploitation of Children
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecutor
Michael Henry McDonnell
Appellant
Rhys Mervyn Henry Johnson
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the total sentences imposed were manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge erred in applying the totality principle
- 3 Whether there was double counting of aggravating factors
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge correctly applied the totality principle, made substantial downward adjustments for consecutive sentences, and did not double count aggravating factors. The total sentences imposed were not manifestly excessive and were justified given the seriousness of the offences, including the exploitation of a child and large-scale drug supply.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeals against sentence dismissed
- Record in relation to count 7 amended to six years' imprisonment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment