Isaacs, R. v [2023] EWCA Crim 1419 (16 November 2023)
No good reason was shown for the delay since 1974, and no substantial injustice would result from refusing the extension of time. The proposed appeal had no prospect of success because the underlying facts admitted by the applicant amounted to conspiracy to defraud, which remained an offence at common law.
- Citation
- [2023] EWCA Crim 1419
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Michael Isaacs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 November 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Renew Applications for Extension of Time and for Leave to Appeal Conviction
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Conspiracy to Commit Public Mischief, Conspiracy to Defraud, Finality of Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Michael Isaacs
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Renew Applications for Extension of Time and for Leave to Appeal Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an extension of time should be granted to renew applications for extension of time and for leave to appeal against conviction from 1969
- 2 Whether the conviction for conspiracy to commit acts of public mischief remains valid in light of subsequent legal developments
Ratio Decidendi
No good reason was shown for the delay since 1974, and no substantial injustice would result from refusing the extension of time. The proposed appeal had no prospect of success because the underlying facts admitted by the applicant amounted to conspiracy to defraud, which remained an offence at common law.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- Application for extension of time to renew applications for extension of time and for leave to appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment