Brennan v R.
Where the only issue at trial is diminished responsibility, and the defence is supported by uncontradicted and unchallenged expert psychiatric evidence, with no rational basis in other evidence to reject it, a conviction for murder is unsafe and must be quashed. The proper verdict is manslaughter.
- Parties
- Appellant: Michael James Brennan; Respondent: The Crown
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction (murder) From Crown Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; murder conviction quashed; manslaughter verdict substituted; sentencing adjourned for further reports.
- Legal Topics
- Diminished Responsibility, Expert Evidence, Murder, Manslaughter, Jury Directions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael James Brennan
Appellant
The Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction (murder) From Crown Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction for murder was safe in light of uncontradicted expert evidence supporting diminished responsibility under s.2 Homicide Act 1957 as amended
- 2 Whether the trial judge should have withdrawn the murder charge from the jury
- 3 Whether the jury was entitled to reject unchallenged expert psychiatric evidence
Ratio Decidendi
Where the only issue at trial is diminished responsibility, and the defence is supported by uncontradicted and unchallenged expert psychiatric evidence, with no rational basis in other evidence to reject it, a conviction for murder is unsafe and must be quashed. The proper verdict is manslaughter.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; murder conviction quashed; manslaughter verdict substituted; sentencing adjourned for further reports.
Orders
- Conviction for murder quashed
- Verdict of manslaughter substituted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment