Fairmays (a firm) v Palmer
Service of proceedings issued for service within the jurisdiction is not valid if the defendant is physically outside the jurisdiction at the time of deemed service; therefore, the default judgment must be set aside as the proceedings were never properly served.
- Parties
- Claimant: Fairmays (formerly Palmer Cowen) (A Firm); Defendant: Michael James Palmer
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 January 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Order Refusing to Set Aside Default Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; default judgment set aside
- Legal Topics
- Service of Process, Jurisdiction, Default Judgment, Setting Aside Judgment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fairmays (formerly Palmer Cowen) (A Firm)
Claimant
Michael James Palmer
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Order Refusing to Set Aside Default Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether service of proceedings issued for service within the jurisdiction is valid when the defendant is physically outside the jurisdiction at the time of deemed service
- 2 Whether default judgment can stand where service was not effected in accordance with the rules
Ratio Decidendi
Service of proceedings issued for service within the jurisdiction is not valid if the defendant is physically outside the jurisdiction at the time of deemed service; therefore, the default judgment must be set aside as the proceedings were never properly served.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; default judgment set aside
Orders
- Default judgment set aside
- Proceedings declared not properly served
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment