Jervis v Pillar Denton Ltd (Game Station) & Ors
The court followed Goldacre and Luminar, holding that rent, service charge, and insurance payments falling due in advance before administration are not administration expenses, while those falling due in advance during administration are payable in full as administration expenses, regardless of subsequent vacation...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Michael John Andrew Jervis; Respondents: Pillar Denton Limited (Game Station) and Others; Respondent: Game Retail Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 July 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Directions Under Paragraph 63 of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986 / Judgment at First Instance, Permission to Appeal Granted
- Outcome
- Order made in terms agreed by parties; permission to appeal granted to landlords and cross-appeal to Game Retail Limited.
- Legal Topics
- Administration Expenses, Priority of Rent Payments, Leasehold Liabilities, Apportionment of Rent, Permission to Appeal
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael John Andrew Jervis
Applicant
Pillar Denton Limited (Game Station) and Others
Respondents
Game Retail Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Directions Under Paragraph 63 of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986 / Judgment at First Instance, Permission to Appeal Granted
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether rent, service charge, and insurance payments due under leases should be treated as expenses of the administration and accorded priority
- 2 Effect of recent authorities on rent payable in advance when administrators appointed after rent falls due
- 3 Whether the Lundy Granite principle requires apportionment of rent for periods of beneficial use
Ratio Decidendi
The court followed Goldacre and Luminar, holding that rent, service charge, and insurance payments falling due in advance before administration are not administration expenses, while those falling due in advance during administration are payable in full as administration expenses, regardless of subsequent vacation of premises.
Court Disposition
Order made in terms agreed by parties; permission to appeal granted to landlords and cross-appeal to Game Retail Limited.
Orders
- Neither the quarterly rent which fell due in advance on 25th March 2012 nor any part thereof is payable as an expense of the administration in respect of the Four Leases or the Eldon Square Lease.
- No sums in respect of service charge that fell due for payment in advance prior to the Administrators' appointment on 26th March 2012 and remain unpaid are payable as an expense of the administration in respect of the Four Leases or the Eldon Square Lease.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment