Silvester, R v
The confiscation order was wrong in principle because the sentencing judge was not informed of the Bank's intention to pursue civil proceedings, which would have given him discretion under s.71(1C) of the Criminal Justice Act 1988. The order was made without the judge being in possession of the true factual position, and thus must be quashed.
- Parties
- Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Michael John Silvester
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 November 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Confiscation Order After Conviction and Sentencing
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; confiscation order quashed
- Legal Topics
- Confiscation Orders, Compensation Orders, Double Recovery, Civil Proceedings by Victim
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Respondent
Michael John Silvester
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Confiscation Order After Conviction and Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the confiscation order was wrong in principle where the victim had pursued and recovered a civil judgment
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge was properly informed of the Bank's intention to pursue civil proceedings
- 3 Whether the court should exercise discretion to make a confiscation order or compensation order when civil proceedings are intended or ongoing
Ratio Decidendi
The confiscation order was wrong in principle because the sentencing judge was not informed of the Bank's intention to pursue civil proceedings, which would have given him discretion under s.71(1C) of the Criminal Justice Act 1988. The order was made without the judge being in possession of the true factual position, and thus must be quashed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; confiscation order quashed
Orders
- Confiscation order quashed
- Sum not to be returned to the appellant for 42 days to allow the Bank to secure its judgment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment