Stone, R v [2005] EWCA Crim 105 (21st January 2005)

Stone, R v [2005] EWCA Crim 105 (21st January 2005)

The Court held that the trial judge's directions to the jury were sufficient given the circumstances, and the fresh evidence regarding Daley's drug addiction, mental instability, and subsequent misconduct did not materially affect the safety of the conviction. The jury was already aware of Daley's flaws, and the new material merely confirmed what was apparent at trial. There was no requirement for a special warning beyond what was given, and the appeal was dismissed.

Citation
[2005] EWCA Crim 105
Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: Michael John Stone
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Cell Confessions, Bad Character Evidence, Judicial Directions, Fresh Evidence, Credibility of Witnesses
Criminal Law Cell Confessions Bad Character Evidence Judicial Directions Fresh Evidence Credibility of Witnesses

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 18 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Michael John Stone

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge failed to give adequate warnings regarding the evidence of a prison informant with bad character and motives to lie
  2. 2 Whether fresh evidence regarding the informant's drug addiction, mental instability, and subsequent misconduct undermined the safety of the conviction
  3. 3 Whether the judge's directions to the jury were sufficient given the risks associated with cell confessions

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the trial judge's directions to the jury were sufficient given the circumstances, and the fresh evidence regarding Daley's drug addiction, mental instability, and subsequent misconduct did not materially affect the safety of the conviction. The jury was already aware of Daley's flaws, and the new material merely confirmed what was apparent at trial. There was no requirement for a special warning beyond what was given, and the appeal was dismissed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Convictions upheld
  • No further orders