Manches & Co v. Joseph [2001] EWHC QB 448 (9th November, 2001)

Manches & Co v. Joseph [2001] EWHC QB 448 (9th November, 2001)

The defendant's complaints do not amount to any viable cause of action or defence in law. There was no challenge to the charging rates or hours worked, no evidence of breach of duty or causation of loss, and no total failure of consideration. The solicitors acted within the scope of reasonable professional practice....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2001] EWHC QB 448
Parties
Claimant: Manches & Co (A Firm); Defendant: Michael Joseph
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Procedural Posture
Civil / Trial Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the Claimants
Legal Topics
Solicitors' Fees, Professional Negligence, Failure of Consideration, Retainer Agreements, Defamation Proceedings, Costs Recovery
Contract Law Professional Negligence Solicitors' Fees Failure of Consideration Retainer Agreements Defamation Proceedings Costs Recovery

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Manches & Co (A Firm)

Claimant

Michael Joseph

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Trial Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant solicitors are entitled to recover outstanding fees for services rendered to the defendant in connection with libel proceedings
  2. 2 Whether the defendant can succeed in a counterclaim for professional negligence or total failure of consideration against the solicitors

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant's complaints do not amount to any viable cause of action or defence in law. There was no challenge to the charging rates or hours worked, no evidence of breach of duty or causation of loss, and no total failure of consideration. The solicitors acted within the scope of reasonable professional practice. The claim for outstanding fees succeeds and the counterclaim fails.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the Claimants

Orders

  • Defendant to pay the outstanding fees claimed by the Claimants
  • Counterclaim dismissed