Cheshire East Borough Council v Maloney

Cheshire East Borough Council v Maloney

The defendant, Michael Maloney, was found guilty beyond reasonable doubt of contempt of court for multiple, deliberate breaches of planning injunctions, including unauthorised development and siting of caravans. The seriousness and persistence of the contempts warranted a custodial sentence, but the sentence was suspended due to proportionality, the impact of COVID-19, and the defendant's existing custody. The injunction was continued with terms limiting the number of caravans to the pre-breach status quo, balancing public interest in enforcement with the rights and welfare of affected children.

Parties
Claimant: Cheshire East Borough Council; Defendant: Michael Maloney
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
04 May 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil (contempt/planning Injunction) / Final Judgment and Sentencing After Finding of Contempt
Outcome
Defendant found guilty of contempt of court; sentenced to 8 months imprisonment suspended for 2 years; continuing injunction granted; costs awarded to claimant.
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Planning Injunctions, Enforcement of Court Orders, Article 8 ECHR, Public Sector Equality Duty
Planning Law Civil Procedure Human Rights Contempt of Court Planning Injunctions Enforcement of Court Orders Article 8 ECHR Public Sector Equality Duty

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cheshire East Borough Council

Claimant

Michael Maloney

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil (contempt/planning Injunction) / Final Judgment and Sentencing After Finding of Contempt

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant breached planning injunctions and is in contempt of court
  2. 2 Appropriate sanction for contempt of court
  3. 3 Terms and proportionality of continuing injunction

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant, Michael Maloney, was found guilty beyond reasonable doubt of contempt of court for multiple, deliberate breaches of planning injunctions, including unauthorised development and siting of caravans. The seriousness and persistence of the contempts warranted a custodial sentence, but the sentence was suspended due to proportionality, the impact of COVID-19, and the defendant's existing custody. The injunction was continued with terms limiting the number of caravans to the pre-breach status quo, balancing public interest in enforcement with the rights and welfare of affected children.

Court Disposition

Defendant found guilty of contempt of court; sentenced to 8 months imprisonment suspended for 2 years; continuing injunction granted; costs awarded to claimant.

Orders

  • Committal order of 8 months imprisonment suspended for 2 years on condition of compliance with injunction
  • Defendant to obey terms of injunction until 13 August 2025, including no more than 8 caravans on site