The Royal Bank of Scotland Plc v MccArthy [2015] EWHC 3626 (QB) (21 December 2015)
Mr McCarthy is liable to repay the professional practice loan to RBS under the terms of the loan agreement. RBS did not procure a breach of contract by the LLP, as the evidence did not establish that the LLP would have repaid the loan but for RBS's actions, nor was there a collateral contract or implied term discharging Mr McCarthy's liability. Mr McCarthy cannot enforce the Letter of Undertaking as a third party under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999. The claim is a straightforward debt claim and the defences fail.
- Citation
- [2015] EWHC 3626
- Parties
- Claimant: The Royal Bank of Scotland PLC; Defendant: Michael Patrick McCarthy
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Debt Claim (contract) / High Court Trial Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed
- Legal Topics
- Repayment of Professional Practice Loan, Procurement of Breach of Contract, Collateral Contract, Implied Terms, Third Party Rights Under Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Royal Bank of Scotland PLC
Claimant
Michael Patrick McCarthy
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Debt Claim (contract) / High Court Trial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Is Mr McCarthy liable to repay the professional practice loan to RBS upon his retirement from Halliwells LLP?
- 2 Did RBS procure a breach of contract by preventing Halliwells LLP from repaying the loan under the Retirement Deed and/or Letter of Undertaking?
- 3 Can Mr McCarthy enforce the Letter of Undertaking as a third party under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999?
Ratio Decidendi
Mr McCarthy is liable to repay the professional practice loan to RBS under the terms of the loan agreement. RBS did not procure a breach of contract by the LLP, as the evidence did not establish that the LLP would have repaid the loan but for RBS's actions, nor was there a collateral contract or implied term discharging Mr McCarthy's liability. Mr McCarthy cannot enforce the Letter of Undertaking as a third party under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999. The claim is a straightforward debt claim and the defences fail.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed
Orders
- Judgment for RBS against Mr McCarthy for the sum of £120,000 plus interest and costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment