Lyons v R
The order to undergo weapons training was lawful; the appellant's conscientious objection claim was properly processed and rejected. Article 9 ECHR does not require suspension of military duties pending determination of such a claim. The Geneva Conventions do not prohibit weapons training for medical assistants. Honest belief in unlawfulness is not a defence under section 12. The sentence was not manifestly excessive given the seriousness of the offence.
- Parties
- Appellant: Michael Peter Lyons; Respondent: R
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 December 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Court Martial Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Disobedience to Lawful Command, Conscientious Objection, Military Discipline, European Convention on Human Rights Article 9
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Peter Lyons
Appellant
R
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Court Martial Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the order to undergo weapon training was a lawful command in light of the appellant's claim to conscientious objection
- 2 Whether the appellant's rights under Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights were violated
- 3 Whether the Geneva Conventions prohibited the order for weapons training for a medical assistant
Ratio Decidendi
The order to undergo weapons training was lawful; the appellant's conscientious objection claim was properly processed and rejected. Article 9 ECHR does not require suspension of military duties pending determination of such a claim. The Geneva Conventions do not prohibit weapons training for medical assistants. Honest belief in unlawfulness is not a defence under section 12. The sentence was not manifestly excessive given the seriousness of the offence.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment