Paragon Offshore Plc, Re [2021] EWHC 2275 (Ch) (13 August 2021)
The Revised Rule 14.11 application was dismissed because Paragon Parent was personally liable under the finance documents, the claims were not non-recourse, the Loan Note Instrument did not represent deficiency claims, and no proof of debt had been submitted or admitted in respect of the Loan Note Instrument, making Rule 14.11 inapplicable. The application had no real prospect of success and was suitable for summary judgment.
- Citation
- [2021] EWHC 2275 (Ch)
- Parties
- Applicant: Michael R. Hammersley; First Respondent (joint Liquidator): Nicholas Guy Edwards; Second Respondent (joint Liquidator): David Philip Soden; Third Respondent: Paragon Offshore Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 August 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Insolvency Application / Summary Judgment on Application to Strike Out/dismiss Revised Rule 14.11 Application
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; summary judgment granted for the Joint Liquidators.
- Legal Topics
- Proof of Debt, Summary Judgment, Personal Liability of Guarantor, Non Recourse Claims, US Bankruptcy Code Section 1111(b), Loan Note Instrument, Intercompany Liabilities
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael R. Hammersley
Applicant
Nicholas Guy Edwards
First Respondent (joint Liquidator)
David Philip Soden
Second Respondent (joint Liquidator)
Paragon Offshore Limited
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Insolvency Application / Summary Judgment on Application to Strike Out/dismiss Revised Rule 14.11 Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Loan Note Instrument held by Paragon Offshore Limited should be excluded as a proof of debt under Rule 14.11 of the Insolvency Rules 2016
- 2 Whether Paragon Offshore PLC was personally liable for certain financial liabilities or only for secured/non-recourse claims
- 3 Whether the Revised Rule 14.11 application had real prospects of success
Ratio Decidendi
The Revised Rule 14.11 application was dismissed because Paragon Parent was personally liable under the finance documents, the claims were not non-recourse, the Loan Note Instrument did not represent deficiency claims, and no proof of debt had been submitted or admitted in respect of the Loan Note Instrument, making Rule 14.11 inapplicable. The application had no real prospect of success and was suitable for summary judgment.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; summary judgment granted for the Joint Liquidators.
Orders
- Revised Rule 14.11 application dismissed.
- Summary judgment granted in favour of the Joint Liquidators.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment