Michael R Hammersley, Re
Mr Hammersley is not a creditor of Paragon Offshore PLC, as determined in prior judgments, and his proposed claims are attempts to relitigate issues already decided. There is no merit in his applications, and permission to bring the claim or summary judgment is refused.
- Parties
- Applicant: Michael R Hammersley; Respondent: David Philip Soden; Respondent: Paragon Offshore Limited (New Paragon); Interested Party: Joint Liquidators of Paragon Offshore PLC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 March 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Judgment on Permission to Bring Claim
- Outcome
- permission refused
- Legal Topics
- Administration Order, Creditor Status, Civil Restraint Order, Summary Judgment, Pre Action Disclosure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael R Hammersley
Applicant
David Philip Soden
Respondent
Paragon Offshore Limited (New Paragon)
Respondent
Joint Liquidators of Paragon Offshore PLC
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Application / Judgment on Permission to Bring Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Hammersley has standing as a creditor to bring a claim against the liquidators and New Paragon
- 2 Whether permission should be granted to bring a Pulsford claim
- 3 Whether prior judgments preclude the proposed claim
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Hammersley is not a creditor of Paragon Offshore PLC, as determined in prior judgments, and his proposed claims are attempts to relitigate issues already decided. There is no merit in his applications, and permission to bring the claim or summary judgment is refused.
Court Disposition
permission refused
Orders
- Permission to bring the proposed claim is refused.
- Permission to bring summary judgment claim is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment