ACL Netherlands BV & Ors v Lynch & Anor [2022] EWHC 1178 (Ch) (17 May 2022)

ACL Netherlands BV & Ors v Lynch & Anor [2022] EWHC 1178 (Ch) (17 May 2022)

The court found that Autonomy's published information was untrue and misleading, Defendants Lynch and Hussain had guilty knowledge and acted dishonestly, and Claimants relied on the misrepresentations in acquiring Autonomy. Defendants are liable under FSMA Schedule 10A, for fraudulent misrepresentation, and for...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] EWHC 1178 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: ACL Netherlands B.V. (as successor to Autonomy Corporation Limited); Claimant: Hewlett-Packard The Hague BV (as successor to Hewlett-Packard Vision BV); Claimant: Autonomy Systems Limited; Claimant: Hewlett-Packard Enterprise New Jersey, Inc; Defendant: Michael Richard Lynch; Defendant: Sushovan Tareque Hussain
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
17 May 2022
Procedural Posture
Commercial Fraud and Misrepresentation / Final Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Claims against both Defendants succeed; Defendants found liable for fraud, misrepresentation, and breach of duty.
Legal Topics
Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Deceit, FSMA Schedule 10 a Liability, Accounting Standards, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Breach of Employment Duty, Quantum of Damages
Commercial Law Financial Services Law Company Law Tort Law Employment Law Fraudulent Misrepresentation Deceit FSMA Schedule 10 a Liability +4 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

ACL Netherlands B.V. (as successor to Autonomy Corporation Limited)

Claimant

Hewlett-Packard The Hague BV (as successor to Hewlett-Packard Vision BV)

Claimant

Autonomy Systems Limited

Claimant

Hewlett-Packard Enterprise New Jersey, Inc

Claimant

Michael Richard Lynch

Defendant

Sushovan Tareque Hussain

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Fraud and Misrepresentation / Final Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Autonomy's published information was untrue or misleading under FSMA Schedule 10A
  2. 2 Whether Defendants had guilty knowledge of false accounting and misrepresentation
  3. 3 Whether Defendants are liable for fraudulent misrepresentation and deceit

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that Autonomy's published information was untrue and misleading, Defendants Lynch and Hussain had guilty knowledge and acted dishonestly, and Claimants relied on the misrepresentations in acquiring Autonomy. Defendants are liable under FSMA Schedule 10A, for fraudulent misrepresentation, and for breach of fiduciary and employment duties. Quantum of loss is determined as pleaded, subject to credit for settlement sums.

Court Disposition

Claims against both Defendants succeed; Defendants found liable for fraud, misrepresentation, and breach of duty.

Orders

  • Defendants to pay damages of at least $4.55 billion under FSMA Schedule 10A
  • Defendants to pay damages of approximately $420 million for fraudulent misrepresentation