Williams v Thomas (Boundary dispute : Boundary dispute) [2019] UKFTT 508 (PC) (24 July 2019)
The hedge and ditch presumption applies, and there used to be a ditch along the boundary, but the outer edge of the ditch cannot be identified with sufficient exactitude for a determined boundary; therefore, the application is cancelled for that section, but succeeds for the undisputed hedge line section.
- Citation
- [2019] UKFTT 508 (PC)
- Parties
- Applicant: Michael Thomas Williams; Applicant: Cherie Lynne Gladstone; Respondent: Judith Megan Thomas
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Boundary Dispute / Determination of Exact Boundary
- Outcome
- application partially succeeded
- Legal Topics
- Boundary Determination, Hedge and Ditch Presumption
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Thomas Williams
Applicant
Cherie Lynne Gladstone
Applicant
Judith Megan Thomas
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Boundary Dispute / Determination of Exact Boundary
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the boundary between the applicants' cottage garden and the respondent's adjoining field can be determined with sufficient exactitude
- 2 Whether the hedge and ditch presumption applies to the disputed boundary section
Ratio Decidendi
The hedge and ditch presumption applies, and there used to be a ditch along the boundary, but the outer edge of the ditch cannot be identified with sufficient exactitude for a determined boundary; therefore, the application is cancelled for that section, but succeeds for the undisputed hedge line section.
Court Disposition
application partially succeeded
Orders
- Application cancelled in relation to the disputed section of the boundary where the ditch could not be identified.
- Application succeeded for the undisputed section following the hedge line.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment