Threapleton, R v [2001] EWCA Crim 2892 (19th December, 2001)
The costs order was unlawful as it was made before the confiscation order, contrary to statutory requirements. The judge was not bound to proceed on the version of facts most favourable to the defendant for the confiscation order; the determination is objective and based on benefit actually accrued.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Crim 2892
- Parties
- Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Michael Threapleton
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Costs Order and Application for Leave to Appeal Against Confiscation Order
- Outcome
- Appeal against costs order allowed; costs order quashed. Leave to appeal against confiscation order refused.
- Legal Topics
- Confiscation Orders, Costs Orders, Corruption, Bribery
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Respondent
Michael Threapleton
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Costs Order and Application for Leave to Appeal Against Confiscation Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a costs order can lawfully be made before a confiscation order under the Criminal Justice Act 1988
- 2 Whether the judge is bound to proceed on the version of facts most favourable to the defendant when making a confiscation order
Ratio Decidendi
The costs order was unlawful as it was made before the confiscation order, contrary to statutory requirements. The judge was not bound to proceed on the version of facts most favourable to the defendant for the confiscation order; the determination is objective and based on benefit actually accrued.
Court Disposition
Appeal against costs order allowed; costs order quashed. Leave to appeal against confiscation order refused.
Orders
- Costs order quashed
- Leave to appeal against confiscation order refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment