Saga Group Ltd & Anor v Paul
The court found convincing proof that rule 57.2 of the 2003 Deed did not reflect the objective intentions of the company and trustees, who intended to retain 'Final Pensionable Salary' as the basis for pension calculation. The evidential threshold for rectification was met, and summary judgment was appropriate as there was no real prospect of defending the claim.
- Parties
- Claimant: Saga Group Limited; Claimant: Saga Pension Trustee Limited; Defendant: Michelle Paul
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Summary Judgment
- Outcome
- summary judgment granted for claimants
- Legal Topics
- Rectification of Pension Scheme Deed, Representation Orders, Summary Judgment Procedure, Open Justice Principle
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Saga Group Limited
Claimant
Saga Pension Trustee Limited
Claimant
Michelle Paul
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Summary Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether rule 57.2 of the 2003 Deed should be rectified to substitute 'Final Pensionable Salary' for 'Pensionable Salary'
- 2 Whether the court should grant summary judgment for rectification based on common mistake
- 3 Whether representation orders should be made for affected scheme members
Ratio Decidendi
The court found convincing proof that rule 57.2 of the 2003 Deed did not reflect the objective intentions of the company and trustees, who intended to retain 'Final Pensionable Salary' as the basis for pension calculation. The evidential threshold for rectification was met, and summary judgment was appropriate as there was no real prospect of defending the claim.
Court Disposition
summary judgment granted for claimants
Orders
- Rectification of the 2003 Deed by substituting 'Final Pensionable Salary' for 'Pensionable Salary' in rule 57.2.
- Appointment of Saga Pension Trustee Limited as representative of persons in whose interests rectification is granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment