Microtechnologies, Llc v Autonomy, Inc (aka HP Autonomy)

Microtechnologies, Llc v Autonomy, Inc (aka HP Autonomy)

The court refused to give effect to the US Letter of Request because the application was oppressive to Mr Hussein, as the allegations in the related English proceedings were not properly particularised for most of the transactions, and there were no undertakings that the evidence would not be used in other proceedings. Granting the order would also place Mr Hussein at a procedural disadvantage in the English proceedings, breaching Article 6 ECHR rights.

Parties
Plaintiff: MicroTechnologies, LLC; Defendant and Plaintiff in Counterclaim: Autonomy, Inc (a/k/a HP Autonomy); Defendant and Plaintiff in Counterclaim: Autonomy Systems Limited; Non Party/respondent: Sushovan Tareque Hussein; Plaintiff (us Proceedings): MicroTech
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
26 July 2016
Procedural Posture
Application Under Evidence (proceedings in Other Jurisdictions) Act 1975 / Ruling on Application to Give Effect to US Letter of Request for Examination of Witness
Outcome
Application refused
Legal Topics
Letters of Request, Oppression, Privilege Against Self Incrimination, Article 6 ECHR, Comity, Evidence Gathering for Foreign Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

MicroTechnologies, LLC

Plaintiff

Autonomy, Inc (a/k/a HP Autonomy)

Defendant and Plaintiff in Counterclaim

Autonomy Systems Limited

Defendant and Plaintiff in Counterclaim

Sushovan Tareque Hussein

Non Party/respondent

MicroTech

Plaintiff (us Proceedings)

Procedural Posture

Application Under Evidence (proceedings in Other Jurisdictions) Act 1975 / Ruling on Application to Give Effect to US Letter of Request for Examination of Witness

  1. 1 Whether the English court should give effect to a US Letter of Request for examination of Mr Hussein
  2. 2 Whether the application is oppressive to Mr Hussein
  3. 3 Whether the privilege against self-incrimination renders the examination pointless

Ratio Decidendi

The court refused to give effect to the US Letter of Request because the application was oppressive to Mr Hussein, as the allegations in the related English proceedings were not properly particularised for most of the transactions, and there were no undertakings that the evidence would not be used in other proceedings. Granting the order would also place Mr Hussein at a procedural disadvantage in the English proceedings, breaching Article 6 ECHR rights.

Court Disposition

Application refused

Orders

  • Order sought by the Autonomy Parties is not granted.