Microtechnologies, Llc v Autonomy, Inc (aka HP Autonomy)
The court refused to give effect to the US Letter of Request because the application was oppressive to Mr Hussein, as the allegations in the related English proceedings were not properly particularised for most of the transactions, and there were no undertakings that the evidence would not be used in other proceedings. Granting the order would also place Mr Hussein at a procedural disadvantage in the English proceedings, breaching Article 6 ECHR rights.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: MicroTechnologies, LLC; Defendant and Plaintiff in Counterclaim: Autonomy, Inc (a/k/a HP Autonomy); Defendant and Plaintiff in Counterclaim: Autonomy Systems Limited; Non Party/respondent: Sushovan Tareque Hussein; Plaintiff (us Proceedings): MicroTech
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 July 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Evidence (proceedings in Other Jurisdictions) Act 1975 / Ruling on Application to Give Effect to US Letter of Request for Examination of Witness
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- Letters of Request, Oppression, Privilege Against Self Incrimination, Article 6 ECHR, Comity, Evidence Gathering for Foreign Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MicroTechnologies, LLC
Plaintiff
Autonomy, Inc (a/k/a HP Autonomy)
Defendant and Plaintiff in Counterclaim
Autonomy Systems Limited
Defendant and Plaintiff in Counterclaim
Sushovan Tareque Hussein
Non Party/respondent
MicroTech
Plaintiff (us Proceedings)
Procedural Posture
Application Under Evidence (proceedings in Other Jurisdictions) Act 1975 / Ruling on Application to Give Effect to US Letter of Request for Examination of Witness
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the English court should give effect to a US Letter of Request for examination of Mr Hussein
- 2 Whether the application is oppressive to Mr Hussein
- 3 Whether the privilege against self-incrimination renders the examination pointless
Ratio Decidendi
The court refused to give effect to the US Letter of Request because the application was oppressive to Mr Hussein, as the allegations in the related English proceedings were not properly particularised for most of the transactions, and there were no undertakings that the evidence would not be used in other proceedings. Granting the order would also place Mr Hussein at a procedural disadvantage in the English proceedings, breaching Article 6 ECHR rights.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- Order sought by the Autonomy Parties is not granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment