Lyndon-Stanford v Mid Suffolk District Council
The claim for judicial review succeeds because the officer reports were significantly misleading regarding the history of the Claimant's efforts to acquire and repair the Barns, affecting the justification for conversion to residential use and the Committee's decision.
- Parties
- Claimant: Michael Lyndon-Stanford QC; Defendant: Mid Suffolk District Council; Interested Party: Duncan West; Interested Party: Peter West; Interested Party: Warren Hill Farms
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim for judicial review allowed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Planning Permission, Listed Building Consent, Heritage Assets, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Lyndon-Stanford QC
Claimant
Mid Suffolk District Council
Defendant
Duncan West
Interested Party
Peter West
Interested Party
Warren Hill Farms
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Council's officer reports misled the Committee regarding the Claimant's efforts to acquire and repair the Barns
- 2 Whether the Council failed to have special regard to the desirability of preserving the Castle's setting as required by statute
- 3 Whether the Committee was misdirected about national planning policy regarding optimum viable use and deliberate neglect
Ratio Decidendi
The claim for judicial review succeeds because the officer reports were significantly misleading regarding the history of the Claimant's efforts to acquire and repair the Barns, affecting the justification for conversion to residential use and the Committee's decision.
Court Disposition
Claim for judicial review allowed
Orders
- Decision of Mid Suffolk District Council granting planning permission and listed building consent quashed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment