Anchor 2020 Ltd v Midas Construction Ltd [2019] EWHC 435 (TCC) (01 March 2019)
A binding contract was formed on 21 July 2014 when Midas signed and returned the contract documents, as essential terms were objectively agreed and parties' conduct evidenced intention to be bound; the Risk Register did not constitute a counter-offer and was not a fundamental contract document.
- Citation
- [2019] EWHC 435 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant: Anchor 2020 Limited; Defendant: Midas Construction Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 March 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Construction Contract Dispute / Trial of Preliminary Issues
- Outcome
- Binding contract found to have been formed on 21 July 2014; preliminary issues determined in favour of Anchor.
- Legal Topics
- Contract Formation, Quantum Meruit, Risk Allocation, Letters of Intent, JCT Design and Build Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anchor 2020 Limited
Claimant
Midas Construction Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Construction Contract Dispute / Trial of Preliminary Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a binding contract was formed on 21 July 2014
- 2 Whether the Risk Register formed part of the contract documents
- 3 Basis for valuation of works after expiry of Letters of Intent
Ratio Decidendi
A binding contract was formed on 21 July 2014 when Midas signed and returned the contract documents, as essential terms were objectively agreed and parties' conduct evidenced intention to be bound; the Risk Register did not constitute a counter-offer and was not a fundamental contract document.
Court Disposition
Binding contract found to have been formed on 21 July 2014; preliminary issues determined in favour of Anchor.
Orders
- Valuation of works to be in accordance with the contract entered into on 21 July 2014.
- Risk Register not a fundamental contract document; excluded risks not transferred to Anchor.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment