Pierens, R (on the application of) v Customs & Excise [2003] EWHC 1993 (Admin) (28 July 2003)
The judge was entitled to consider the entire period of delay, including the context and reasons for all adjournments, and was within his discretion to find good and sufficient cause for extending the custody time limit, despite a relatively minor administrative delay by the court office.
- Citation
- [2003] EWHC 1993 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Patrick Joanna Emile Pierens; Defendant: Middlesex Guildhall Crown Court; Interested Party: HM Customs & Excise
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for judicial review dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Custody Time Limits, Extension of Time, Judicial Discretion, Court Administration Delay
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Patrick Joanna Emile Pierens
Claimant
Middlesex Guildhall Crown Court
Defendant
HM Customs & Excise
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was good and sufficient cause to extend custody time limits under section 22(3) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 when delay was partly due to court administration error and defence applications
Ratio Decidendi
The judge was entitled to consider the entire period of delay, including the context and reasons for all adjournments, and was within his discretion to find good and sufficient cause for extending the custody time limit, despite a relatively minor administrative delay by the court office.
Court Disposition
Application for judicial review dismissed
Orders
- Decision of HHJ Matheson to extend custody time limits is upheld
- Certificate for assessment of claimant's costs granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment