Bromfield v R [2002] EWCA Crim 195 (8th February, 2002)

Bromfield v R [2002] EWCA Crim 195 (8th February, 2002)

The failure to give the specific jury directions identified in Cowan did not render the conviction unsafe because there was a clear prima facie case to answer, the directions given were sufficient to ensure fairness, and the jury could not have convicted solely or mainly on the appellant's silence. The conviction is therefore safe.

Citation
[2002] EWCA Crim 195
Parties
Appellant: Milron Roy Bromfield; Respondent: Regina
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction From Crown Court at Lewes
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; conviction upheld.
Legal Topics
Rape, Jury Directions, Right to Silence, Adverse Inference, Appeals, Criminal Evidence
Criminal Law Rape Jury Directions Right to Silence Adverse Inference Appeals Criminal Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Milron Roy Bromfield

Appellant

Regina

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction From Crown Court at Lewes

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge's directions to the jury regarding the appellant's silence at trial were adequate and in accordance with legal requirements under section 35 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 and relevant case law.
  2. 2 Whether the failure to give certain 'essential' jury directions rendered the conviction unsafe.

Ratio Decidendi

The failure to give the specific jury directions identified in Cowan did not render the conviction unsafe because there was a clear prima facie case to answer, the directions given were sufficient to ensure fairness, and the jury could not have convicted solely or mainly on the appellant's silence. The conviction is therefore safe.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; conviction upheld.