Southward Housing Co-Operative Ltd v Walker & Anor
Tenancies granted by fully mutual housing co-operatives are excluded from statutory security of tenure by operation of the Housing Act 1985 and Housing Act 1988. The tenancy agreement in question is a periodic tenancy, not a lease for life, and is validly terminated by notice to quit in accordance with its terms. The exclusion does not constitute discrimination under Article 14 ECHR, nor is the landlord a public authority for purposes of the Human Rights Act. No declaration of incompatibility is warranted.
- Parties
- Claimant: Southward Housing Co-operative Limited; Defendant: Miss Vicky Walker; Defendant: Mr David Hay; Interested Party: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Possession Proceedings / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Defence and counterclaim dismissed; possession order granted to Claimant.
- Legal Topics
- Security of Tenure, Discrimination, Possession Orders, Contractual Licences, Forfeiture, Declaration of Incompatibility, Article 8 ECHR, Article 14 ECHR, Article 1 Protocol 1 ECHR
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Southward Housing Co-operative Limited
Claimant
Miss Vicky Walker
Defendant
Mr David Hay
Defendant
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Possession Proceedings / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether tenancies granted by fully mutual housing co-operatives confer security of tenure
- 2 Whether the tenancy agreement creates a lease for life or a periodic tenancy
- 3 Whether exclusion from statutory security of tenure is discriminatory under Article 14 ECHR
Ratio Decidendi
Tenancies granted by fully mutual housing co-operatives are excluded from statutory security of tenure by operation of the Housing Act 1985 and Housing Act 1988. The tenancy agreement in question is a periodic tenancy, not a lease for life, and is validly terminated by notice to quit in accordance with its terms. The exclusion does not constitute discrimination under Article 14 ECHR, nor is the landlord a public authority for purposes of the Human Rights Act. No declaration of incompatibility is warranted.
Court Disposition
Defence and counterclaim dismissed; possession order granted to Claimant.
Orders
- Order for possession of the property in favour of the Claimant
- Orders for arrears of rent and/or use and occupation charges/mesne profits
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment