Jagger v Darling & Ors [2005] EWHC 683 (Ch) (09 March 2005)

Jagger v Darling & Ors [2005] EWHC 683 (Ch) (09 March 2005)

On the uncontested evidence, the claimant had a legitimate expectation of privacy regarding the CCTV footage, and the balance of rights falls in favour of restraining publication, as there is no legitimate public interest in further dissemination of the images.

Citation
[2005] EWHC 683 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: Elizabeth Jagger; Defendants: John Darling & Others
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
09 March 2005
Procedural Posture
Interim Injunction Application / Interlocutory
Outcome
interim injunction granted
Legal Topics
Misuse of Private Information, Copyright, Interim Injunction, Article 8 ECHR, Article 10 ECHR
Privacy Law Intellectual Property Human Rights Misuse of Private Information Copyright Interim Injunction Article 8 ECHR Article 10 ECHR

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Elizabeth Jagger

Claimant

John Darling & Others

Defendants

Procedural Posture

Interim Injunction Application / Interlocutory

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to an interim injunction restraining publication of CCTV footage on grounds of privacy and copyright
  2. 2 Whether the balance between privacy rights and freedom of expression justifies the relief sought

Ratio Decidendi

On the uncontested evidence, the claimant had a legitimate expectation of privacy regarding the CCTV footage, and the balance of rights falls in favour of restraining publication, as there is no legitimate public interest in further dissemination of the images.

Court Disposition

interim injunction granted

Orders

  • Defendants restrained from disclosing, publishing, syndicating, or using any CCTV footage or images of the claimant at Kabaret nightclub on 16/17 February 2005 until trial or further order.
  • Defendants must preserve all relevant items in their possession.