iSOFT Group Plc v Misys Holdings Ltd. & Anor [2002] EWHC 2094 (Ch) (16 October 2002)
Clause 11.4.2 required Misys to make an offer to iSOFT for the Target Business at fair market value and on fair and reasonable terms, and such offer must be capable of acceptance so as to give rise to a binding contract. The clause is sufficiently certain to be specifically enforced, and the court can supply machinery to determine fair market value and fair and reasonable terms if the parties cannot agree. The obligation is enforceable and not void for uncertainty.
- Citation
- [2002] EWHC 2094 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: iSOFT Group plc; Defendant: Misys Holdings Limited; Defendant: Misys plc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 October 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Contract Dispute / High Court (chancery Division) Trial Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in part; declaration granted as to enforceability of clause 11.4.2; directions for further determination of fair market value and terms if not agreed.
- Legal Topics
- Certainty of Contractual Terms, Specific Performance, Restrictive Covenants, Sale of Business, Enforceability of Agreements, Restraint of Trade
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
iSOFT Group plc
Claimant
Misys Holdings Limited
Defendant
Misys plc
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contract Dispute / High Court (chancery Division) Trial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether clause 11.4.2 of the ACT Sale Agreement required Misys to make an offer capable of acceptance for the sale of the Target Business to iSOFT
- 2 Whether the clause is sufficiently certain to be specifically enforced
- 3 Whether the court can supply machinery to determine fair market value and fair and reasonable terms
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 11.4.2 required Misys to make an offer to iSOFT for the Target Business at fair market value and on fair and reasonable terms, and such offer must be capable of acceptance so as to give rise to a binding contract. The clause is sufficiently certain to be specifically enforced, and the court can supply machinery to determine fair market value and fair and reasonable terms if the parties cannot agree. The obligation is enforceable and not void for uncertainty.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in part; declaration granted as to enforceability of clause 11.4.2; directions for further determination of fair market value and terms if not agreed.
Orders
- Declaration that Misys is obliged to make an offer to iSOFT for the Target Business at fair market value and on fair and reasonable terms, such offer to be capable of acceptance.
- If the parties cannot agree fair market value or terms, the court will determine them or supply appropriate machinery.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment