MK v R [2018] EWCA Crim 667 (28 March 2018)
Section 45 of the Modern Slavery Act 2015 does not impose a legal or persuasive burden of proof on the defendant for any element of the statutory defence. The defendant bears only an evidential burden to raise the defence, and the prosecution must disprove one or more elements to the criminal standard. This interpretation aligns with the statutory language, the purpose of the Act, and the UK's international obligations to protect victims of trafficking and slavery.
- Citation
- [2018] EWCA Crim 667
- Parties
- Appellant: MK; Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Persida Gega (a.k.a. Anna Maione)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 March 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal (criminal Division) Judgment on Appeal From Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- MK: conviction quashed, retrial ordered; Gega: conviction upheld, appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Burden of Proof, Statutory Defences, Modern Slavery, Trafficking, Reverse Onus, Duress, Evidential Burden, Persuasive Burden
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MK
Appellant
Regina
Respondent
Persida Gega (a.k.a. Anna Maione)
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal (criminal Division) Judgment on Appeal From Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Does section 45 of the Modern Slavery Act 2015 impose a legal (persuasive) or evidential burden of proof on the defendant when raising the statutory defence for victims of slavery or trafficking?
- 2 Who bears the burden of proof regarding the elements of the section 45 defence, including age, compulsion, and causation?
Ratio Decidendi
Section 45 of the Modern Slavery Act 2015 does not impose a legal or persuasive burden of proof on the defendant for any element of the statutory defence. The defendant bears only an evidential burden to raise the defence, and the prosecution must disprove one or more elements to the criminal standard. This interpretation aligns with the statutory language, the purpose of the Act, and the UK's international obligations to protect victims of trafficking and slavery.
Court Disposition
MK: conviction quashed, retrial ordered; Gega: conviction upheld, appeal dismissed
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted for both appellants.
- MK: Appeal allowed, conviction quashed, retrial ordered.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment