MK v R
Section 45 of the Modern Slavery Act 2015 does not impose a legal or persuasive burden of proof on the defendant for any element of the defence. The defendant bears only an evidential burden; the prosecution must disprove each element to the criminal standard.
- Parties
- Appellant: MK; Respondent: REGINA; Appellant: Persida Gega (a.k.a. Anna Maione)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 March 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed for MK; conviction quashed and retrial ordered. Appeal granted for Gega but dismissed; conviction upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Burden of Proof, Statutory Defence, Modern Slavery, Human Trafficking, Reverse Onus, Duress, Identity Documents
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MK
Appellant
REGINA
Respondent
Persida Gega (a.k.a. Anna Maione)
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the legal or persuasive burden of proof rests on the defendant when raising a defence under section 45 of the Modern Slavery Act 2015
- 2 Whether section 45 imposes a legal or evidential burden on the defendant
- 3 Whether the prosecution must disprove the elements of the defence to the criminal standard
Ratio Decidendi
Section 45 of the Modern Slavery Act 2015 does not impose a legal or persuasive burden of proof on the defendant for any element of the defence. The defendant bears only an evidential burden; the prosecution must disprove each element to the criminal standard.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed for MK; conviction quashed and retrial ordered. Appeal granted for Gega but dismissed; conviction upheld.
Orders
- Retrial ordered for MK.
- Application for leave to appeal against sentence for MK falls away.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment