MKG Convenience Ltd, Re

MKG Convenience Ltd, Re

The respondents committed serious and significant breaches of the unless order for disclosure, including deliberate concealment of relevant bank accounts and failure to disclose accounting records and utility invoices. There was no credible explanation or good reason for the breaches. The breaches adversely affected...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Applicant (joint Liquidator of MKG Convenience Ltd): Mustafa Hassanali Abdulali; Applicant (joint Liquidator of MKG Convenience Ltd): Neil James Dingley; Applicant: MKG Convenience Ltd; Respondent: URL Local Express Ltd; Respondent: KKS Investments Ltd; Respondent: Kathiraavelu Komaleswaran
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
09 March 2020
Procedural Posture
Insolvency/company Law / Application for Judgment Following Breach of Unless Order for Disclosure; Application for Relief From Sanctions
Outcome
Relief from sanctions refused; judgment for applicants
Legal Topics
Disclosure Obligations, Relief From Sanctions, Liquidation, Director Liability, Extended Disclosure, Unless Orders
Insolvency Law Company Law Civil Procedure Disclosure Obligations Relief From Sanctions Liquidation Director Liability Extended Disclosure +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mustafa Hassanali Abdulali

Applicant (joint Liquidator of MKG Convenience Ltd)

Neil James Dingley

Applicant (joint Liquidator of MKG Convenience Ltd)

MKG Convenience Ltd

Applicant

URL Local Express Ltd

Respondent

KKS Investments Ltd

Respondent

Kathiraavelu Komaleswaran

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Insolvency/company Law / Application for Judgment Following Breach of Unless Order for Disclosure; Application for Relief From Sanctions

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondents breached the unless order for disclosure
  2. 2 Whether relief from sanctions should be granted to the respondents
  3. 3 Whether the applicants are entitled to judgment as a result of the breach

Ratio Decidendi

The respondents committed serious and significant breaches of the unless order for disclosure, including deliberate concealment of relevant bank accounts and failure to disclose accounting records and utility invoices. There was no credible explanation or good reason for the breaches. The breaches adversely affected the conduct of the litigation and deprived the applicants of essential information. Relief from sanctions is refused, and the applicants are entitled to judgment in accordance with the unless order.

Court Disposition

Relief from sanctions refused; judgment for applicants

Orders

  • Respondents' evidence struck out
  • Respondents debarred from defending the proceedings