MO v The Information Commissioner & Anor

MO v The Information Commissioner & Anor

The Tribunal found that the report was provided in confidence, disclosure would likely cause detriment to Bristol Fawcett members, and the public interest in maintaining confidentiality outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Section 41 FOIA was engaged and the exemption applied; the appeal was dismissed.

Parties
Appellant: MO; First Respondent: The Information Commissioner; Second Respondent: Bristol City Council
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under Freedom of Information Act 2000 / Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Freedom of Information, Confidential Information, Public Interest Defence, Article 10 ECHR
Information Law Administrative Law Freedom of Information Confidential Information Public Interest Defence Article 10 ECHR

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

MO

Appellant

The Information Commissioner

First Respondent

Bristol City Council

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal Under Freedom of Information Act 2000 / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Bristol City Council was entitled to rely on section 41 of FOIA to withhold the requested information
  2. 2 Whether the public interest in maintaining confidentiality outweighed the public interest in disclosure
  3. 3 Whether Article 10 ECHR (freedom of expression) required disclosure

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the report was provided in confidence, disclosure would likely cause detriment to Bristol Fawcett members, and the public interest in maintaining confidentiality outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Section 41 FOIA was engaged and the exemption applied; the appeal was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed